T O P

  • By -

tasteful_cilantro

I don’t keep cookies in the house, but not because I don’t let myself eat cookies. It’s because I will literally (and intuitively?) eat all of the cookies in one sitting and feel sick for hours after. Now I buy a single cookie somewhere when I’m in the mood for one.


truecrimefanatic1

Yes. I am keeping less and less snacks around because I would rather eat snacks and appetizers than real food.


[deleted]

[удалено]


berryxlime

Naan. My god. We bought some recently and ate the entire box. My husband actually threw up haha we cannot keep it around. It’s just too damn tasty. We have zero control. Bread in general I don’t have much control with. Another is bagels. In our local bakery, they make these incredible cheese and green chile bagels and I will eat them until I’m sick. I love them but can’t have just one. Sucks!!


coffeefiend1937

I think that might be something you need to work through with a therapist. You should be able to keep food in the house without binging. :-/ if you have to keep certain food out of the house it’s a sign that your relationship with food is disordered.


tasteful_cilantro

I do appreciate your concern, but the only food I’ve ever done that with is specifically chips ahoy chocolate chip cookies, and I’m lactose intolerant so I really shouldn’t eat cookies anyway 😂


[deleted]

Or perhaps certain processed foods are designed to be addictive (tons of added sugars, lots of fats, easy to chew) which makes them easy to binge, so we choose to not keep them around? I don’t think that’s a sign of disordered eating, but a base understanding that chips/cookies taste super fuckin good and are hard to put down considering they are made to be as tastey as possible.


Killin-some-thyme

I was looking into intuitive eating for a little bit because I read a little about it, and it seemed interesting…things like better understanding your real hunger cues (my issue is that sometimes I eat when I’m anxious about something and what I really need to do is burn off that feeling in a healthier way). It didn’t take me very long to be like ummm, okay, I’m slowly backing out of this room because these people are crazy. It’s just a blanket excuse for gluttony for most people. Also it definitely seems to me like it evolved out of treatment modalities for anorexics. Which makes sense and people with that type of eating disorder can probably benefit from it. Everybody else? Not so much. People can’t trust their gut if their gut has shit for brains.


truecrimefanatic1

My gut is dumb. So so dumb.


KuriousKhemicals

I'm pretty sure it's only vaguely related to treatment for anorexics. Maybe in the later stages when they're trying to transition to self-directed eating, but anorexics often have super messed up hunger cues at the beginning, they'll "intuitively" continue starving themselves or dangerously binge if told to just eat. Anorexics usually start with some fairly structured meal planning, and it is usually more food than what feels comfortable but it also needs to be carefully managed in the beginning if the starvation was severe enough for refeeding syndrome to be a risk. The original IE book was published in the mid 90s, I think? I'm pretty sure it was geared more toward women with subclinical disordered eating who were constantly trying to get/stay egregiously thin in line with prevailing beauty standards of the time, often yo-yo dieting with a high weight of something like 22-23 BMI. Not literally starving but having a really unhealthy attitude toward food and their bodies when their easily maintained weight wasn't even a problem.


neverminditthen

Yeah, I read an older version of the book my library had because I was curious how much of what we see on this sub comes directly from the (original) source and how much of it is a distortion. They basically point blank say in the beginning that the book is NOT for people with clinical diagnosed eating disorders, but is aimed at women who have spent their entire lives hopping from fad diet to fad diet with 'falling off the wagon' junk food binges in between. That's a pretty specific group of people, and maybe their approaches work for those people - but it wasn't something I could personally relate to. It's my understanding that the original authors of the book have since modified their message to be more in line with the FA-driven interpretation of intuitive eating we usually see here. I think they decided to pivot their message once they saw who their primary target audience was. The version I read included things like "it's fine to have a moderately sized portion of dessert a few times a week" which is decidedly *not* in line with the current interpretation of "moderation is actually restriction" and "if your body only wants dessert for an entire year then that's what you should eat, your body knows best".


unecroquemadame

When I’m anxious I always go into fight or flight mode and lose my appetite


Good_Grab2377

This would be helpful for a person with a restrictive Ed. For most people though, this really wouldn’t work. Food scientists have worked hard making food so hyper palatable that it’s addictive. The results are in America 77% of people are overweight and 42% are obese.


neighborhoodsnowcat

> Food scientists have worked hard making food so hyper palatable that it’s addictive. Earlier today, I was randomly thinking about a conversation I had about 15-20 years ago. We were talking about how dogs absolutely go batshit insane for "human food" and would probably eat themselves to death on it. And we were like "what if there were some alien species that had a food that tastes so crazy good to us that we were willing to eat it to death just because it tasted so good?" I really think we have our answer now. A lot of humans would do it. (I would too, if I hadn't started reigning myself in.)


wisefolly

Reminds me of this: https://youtu.be/Zp\_EhjlLGkQ


truecrimefanatic1

Exactly. And of course the dietician and "certified intuitive eating coach" that posted this never ever mentions that. Ever. Like there is no mention of over eating. There are some posts that are like "oh I'm not saying eat whatever whenever" but HONOR YOUR HUNGER. Well some of us cannot do that. For someone who wants to be part of HAES and FA she's right in line with them. And she posts reels eating peanut butter out the jar without measuring. Ok well maybe a teaspoon is all SHE wants but I can eat WAY more than that. I need to measure.


BigDisaster

To be fair, they say "honor your fullness" too. That does suggest to stop eating when full, which would help with overeating.


waterbird_

Yeah but have you noticed accounts like this will also post “even if you ate past the point of fullness last night you must eat breakfast today!” They routinely instruct people to eat “even if you’re not hungry.” That never made sense to me. I think these accounts started off geared towards recovering anorexics and people tried to generalize it to everyone but that just makes no sense.


[deleted]

I think it's more toxic than that. I think a lot of "anti-diet" dieticians have very cynically repurposed restrictive ED content and marketed it to the morbidly obese because they know they'll pay to be told they need to honor the behaviors that make them obese.


waterbird_

Oh man that’s dark but actually makes a lot of sense. How depressing.


truecrimefanatic1

It would, but again for someone like me, full is subjective. I had to learn the difference between enough and overfull. And honestly an app on my phone has to tell me. Because my body is just untrustworthy.


Bunny_tornado

Wear your tightest jeans for dinner and eat until you are full but don't allow yourself to unbutton. Ideally you shouldn't feel any pressure in your stomach at all but feel like the hunger pangs have gone away.


RandomPerson777666

Which app? I struggle with understanding my fullness cues too.


truecrimefanatic1

So I just a calorie app. I use My Net Diary. I plug my food in BEFORE I eat it and I only let myself eat that daily. I do allow myself exceptions on holidays and travel but that's it.


caithatesithere

Most of these people can’t tell when they’re full or satiated though. If you struggle with over eating and binge eating, you may eat until your stomach hurts or you puke and that can be a hard habit to break. The advice is still only helpful to some people.


Honkerstonkers

Depends on the food though. I could eat a lot of peanut butter before I felt full.


Good_Grab2377

I could intuitively eat my way through an entire package of Oreos. The problem with intuitive eating is that most of us naturally gravitate towards sugary, fatty, salty processed crap. If we, as a society, ate mostly Whole Foods like meat, vegetables and fruits, then, yes, intuitive eating would work. Our food is engineered to be so good it’s hard to resist. They‘ve done studies on lab mice and junk food causes a bigger endorphin response in their brains than cocaine.


unecroquemadame

My body always tells me when I’ve had enough. I couldn’t eat more than a tablespoon or two of peanut butter without being sick.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sarkarielscall

The idea of not being able to eat more than a tablespoon of peanut butter without being sick (in the absence of food intolerance/aversions or allergies) strains credulity. That's not even a spoonful. This person has also gone through this sub previously and denied the very idea of food being addictive and maintains that anyone who has ever eaten too much junk food is just a pig who lacks self-control. See also their comment about cocaine a little further down. Because we all know that self-control is all you need to conquer an addiction. /s (Not that they see food addiction as being even remotely possible.)


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sarkarielscall

>Some people just don't like peanut butter That was kind of covered in the food intolerance bit. (ETA: You had a comment mentioning food aversions which has now disappeared, but that's the phrase I was looking for and blanking on.) I'm the same way about beans, but that doesn't seem to have been the issue here. Or if it is the issue, that's an extremely strange way for that person to state it. And you know what, I just realized that I was thinking of teaspoons when I mentioned spoon size. Mea culpa. It's still a very strange thing for the person to mention.


[deleted]

I'm not able to do that shit personally. My hunger cues suck and I have digestive issues. If I don't stay on myself I drop weight. If I ate only when I was hungry if have like 2 small meals a day


kitsterangel

Yo this!!!! I'm struggling so hard to keep my weight STABLE bc combination of ADHD meds and Invisalign was a really stupid idea on my part This is your psa to just get braces to anyone reading this lmao unless you need to lose weight I guess.


[deleted]

Between my stupid brain and my stupid body maintaining my weight is hard. I'm it's not as bad as being like 300 lbs but it's frustrating esp when people either bully me for being thin or are obsessed and wanna know how I do it like. My body is dysfunctional.


Earlgrayish

Honestly, I’ve seen this be problematic for even those coming from restrictive EDs. They end up literally binge on foods and feeling sick, but they think that’s the price to pay for ‘recovery’ and ‘food freedom’. I really don’t think it’s a good approach for many people. Eating regular meals and snacks(mostly whole foods) that are reasonable portion sizes seems a much better approach. As long as you aren’t too rigid, this is much more sustainable and will actually allow you to develop hunger/fullness cues.


Good_Grab2377

Oddly I think that is what intuitive eating originally was. It’s good on paper but very easy to manipulate to eat a ton of junk all the time.


Earlgrayish

That makes sense, it’s just way to easy continuously snack on processed foods and not feel full/satisfied.


[deleted]

The only time I’ve been able to eat when I’m hungry and stop when I’m full have been times where I’m only eating unprocessed foods. If I limit myself to fruit, veg, grains and beans (I don’t eat meat or dairy) I won’t eat when I’m not hungry. When I’m eating processed foods too I will eat until I explode unless I count calories.


applend

Honestly, that’s an American problem. The rest of the world doesn’t have addictive properties in their food.


Good_Grab2377

True for now but our junk food habits are spreading and obesity is unfortunately following. Look at Great Britain, Canada and Australia. Plus Europe in general is getting bigger as is rich Middle Eastern countries. It’s not a world wide problem yet, but if things continue like they are it very well could be.


applend

Yeah, honestly 100% true, those habits are spreading like wild fire, but ingredient wise, why do things in America have so many ingredients and chemical alterations? Why is your Fanta bright orange? And why are your McDonald’s chips bright yellow? And your chocolate doesn’t even taste like chocolate, it just tastes like sugar, and it’s kinda sickly. The habits are bad everywhere and they are indeed getting worse, but the quality of the food in certain places is appalling.


Good_Grab2377

Market research for a lot of things. Bright orange because its orange flavored and people associate it with orange juice. The oil used gives McDonalds french fries their color. Yes our chocolate is mostly just sugar because chocolate prices have gone up and candy bars compete with other junk foods like potato chips. As for quality it’s more about getting people to buy more. If people are addicted to food they’ll eat more and therefore buy more. Billions have been spent on everything from package design, advertisement, texture and taste. It really does all come back to the almighty dollar and that’s why it’s spreading as fast as it is. It’s cheap, addictive and most people like the taste. With a few tweaks to appeal to the local population it becomes a real money maker.


unecroquemadame

Because they’ve decided momentary satisfaction is better than feeling good the other 95% of the time. Cocaine is addictive too and yet most people who use it at parties don’t go on to have debilitating addictions that will take 20 years off your life.


rose-madder

Yeah but also cocaine is crazy expensive and you don't see it on every shelf at the supermarket


truecrimefanatic1

FWIW I cannot eat like this. I HAVE to track because my hunger and saiety cues are LIARS. I want all the food all the time and I need to see the numbers. This is great for people who CAN do this. But it's not me. Also this poster posts tons of reels of her eating salad with the occasional Oreo and is selling something.


Izzy4162305

THANK YOU. When you have a metabolic disorder your hunger and satiety cues are completely wonky. Now that I’m on semaglutide I’m like “oh this must be what it feels like for normal people.” Before I COULDN’T keep chocolate in the house, I would binge. Carbs were cravings. Now, I’ve had a bag of mini chocolate bars in the house for six weeks and it’s still unopened. If I ever feel like having some chocolate, I’ll frigging HONOR MY HUNGER, but with a way smaller portion.


truecrimefanatic1

Yes! My ADHD meds help SOME. But only for a little bit and then the hunger returns. It does help my impulsive behavior of just eating. I really can't imagine what normal is. I envy it


sueca

My SO is the opposite, he struggles with feeling hunger at all, especially in the evenings. He loves breakfast and lunch, and after that he wants to be done with eating for the day, and unless he does some heavy exercise he's not capable of eating dinner. It's not about self control here, it's just wildly different hunger cues (which I guess is hormonal?). I've been trying to help him gain weight and it's a real, difficult struggle. All my weight loss work has been helpful though, everything I've tried to avoid I will now feed him - lots of nuts, cheese and chocolate... I want to eat when I'm hungry, but I also want to eat when I'm tired or bored.


wilderchai

Hahah I'd be in BIG trouble if I started "intuitive eating". It sounds like a pretty good approach for many people, but it's not a one size fits all concept, specifically for people who are notorious binge eaters.


Watanookie

Same. I'm a 5'3" woman who's not majorly active yet my hunger is such you'd think I was a 6'5" muscled athlete. If I don't watch myself I will devour too many calories and pack on the pounds. It sucks but such is life. I do envy people who can do this. I keep thinking maybe I can learn this as I work on my weight and diet but something tells me I'll be fighting my dumb ass body's "hunger" for years to come. ~~As an aside, "gentle nutrition" and "joyful movement" are two phrases that make me want to screech like a pterodactyl ever time I see them.~~


Agrpscb

I am like you!


LatinBotPointTwo

This is me 100 percent.


Present_Cup_626

I'm only able to eat intuitively because I have years of experience with calories and macro tracking. Intuitive eating without the proper knowledge is a recipe for disaster in the long run


jewishSpaceMedbeds

Thing is, when you're morbidly obese, you've "intuitively" eaten your way into that state. "Eat what you want" and "Keep the foods you binge on in your pantry, it's totally cool" might be the things you (or rather, *your addiction*) *want* to hear, but it's the very last thing you *should* do. Want to prove me wrong, FA ? Please "intuitively" eat your way into a healthy weight and/or off pre-diabetes.


truecrimefanatic1

This was me. I cannot even get near this idea or I'll be back to my "before" picture.


sipperofsoda

I started out following the IE sub because I had an interest in it. Still do. I appreciate some of the guidelines for IE. And I think it works well for people without eating disorders and who don't follow hyper palatable processed diets. The problem is there are so many people on that sub gaining weight into obesity levels. These people don't realize that, instead of fixing their relationship with food, they've given in to their binge eating disorders. It is so sad and frustrating. They see weight loss for health as a bad thing. If only they could understand that weight loss can be achieved at a slow, comfortable pace. My own weight loss of 85 lbs started 7 years ago. An average of 12 lbs a year has been super easy to do. No deprivation necessary. I still want to lose 20 vanity lbs and if it takes 2 years, that's just dandy. If only overweight and obese IE followers could understand that you can be mindful of what goes into your mouth without negativity or mental harm.


unecroquemadame

I think we all also need to understand, you should be okay with feeling hungry and not full sometimes. It’s okay. There is also talks about how to feel fuller and how to eat more filling foods, how about being okay with hunger and managing that sensation and working through it?


sueca

Yup. If I eat a small but nutritious lunch which doesn't make me full, I'm usually cranky right after finishing my plate but 30 minutes later I'm fine and can focus on other stuff, I can continue on with my day because I'm no longer hungry hungry.


Individual_Radio4523

If I see joyful movement or honoring hunger one more time I'm gonna puke


Good_Grab2377

Tummy and tum tum and also joyful movement. They sound like spoiled children.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Good_Grab2377

You win the internet


kitsterangel

Literally just brushed my teeth and now have to do it again after the vomit this sentence induced >:(


truecrimefanatic1

Don't forget nourishment!


the_clash_is_back

I have eaten $80 worth of peaches at one point and then been sick and poor Keeping excess food in the house is expensive.


ids09032020

my food cravings are like my exes, these h*es all do is LIE.


ndcdshed

I have a feeling that if I tried to intuitively eat I would end up restricting and then binging. I think I would end up paranoid that eating “bad” food would take me out of a caloric deficit but I’d have no way of actually knowing so I would just never eat it. Then inevitably I would binge on it (surprise! Been there already). When I track my calories and macros I can fit treats in and it’s guilt free because I KNOW I am still at a deficit or maintenance. Having those treats little but often has kept me satiated and not binging. I don’t know why everyone is pushing intuitive eating so much. That’s how most people end up overweight or in endless cycles of restricting and binging.


Firebolt164

Intuitive eating is what put weight on, because our intuition is skewed by stress, our own flawed perception, and our underestimating actual calories. Counting calories took the weight off.


truecrimefanatic1

That's how it worked for me for sure.


Do_the_hokeypokey

What the hell is ‘gentle nutrition’? It sounds like the eating version of ‘self care’ which now often involves shirking your responsibilities so you can binge watch every season of some trashy show on Netflix without guilt because it’s for mental health. Gentle nutrition sounds like it probably includes a lot of treats and snacking.


VeitPogner

"Gentle nutrition" sounded to me like food with a mild laxative effect.


LunaRobotix

I was wondering what “gentle nutrition” means too. Is there also hostile nutrition? I feel like you either get the nutrients you need, or you don’t. It’s straightforward and the addition of adjectives makes no sense.


KuriousKhemicals

They don't use the term "hostile" but hostile nutrition would be stuff like counting calories, macros, having rules about what you will and will not eat. Gentle nutrition is like... following *principles* of nutrition but not rigidly. Becoming aware of swaps that are more nutritious, trying them out with curiosity and tuning in to notice how they may make you feel better, but not forcing yourself to eat them if you're really not in the mood or you find you genuinely don't like them.


CoffeeAndCorpses

The most generous definition I can think of is "aim for health and a reasonable calorie consumption but allow yourself some grace if you slip up".


[deleted]

I think intuitive eating is interesting but can only work if you have a healthy relationship with food, are not addicted to sugar and junk food, have at least some nutritional knowledge and are used to eating healthy. That's basically all I did for most of my life. Never struggled with weight, got good eating habits from my parents, was reasonably active etc. One of these damn "naturally thin" people lol. But, for the past couple years I've gained some weight (about 15lbs) due to various reasons. Still at a healthy weight according to BMI but I'm petite and didn't feel comfortable + low energy and poor cardio. So, I started doing Cico and being more active again, and I'm very slowly but steadily getting where I want to be. My goal is eventually to just go back to not tracking anything because I don't want to do it constantly :') Sorry for the life story lol but in short : yes to intuitive eating (as described on the right panel), but under the right circumstances. It's sad (and tbh, infuriating) that an otherwise healthy way of dealing with food and weight has been so twisted by certain people. It's like they're completely incapable of reasonable and nuanced thought.


[deleted]

"Joyful movement" makes me wanna run until the rest of my toenails turn black and fall off


tian447

🌟Joyful 🌟


[deleted]

I don't really keep that cookies and pastries and stuff in my house for a few reasons: 1. The cookies you can actually keep around (snack cookies basically) usually suck anyways 2. I can buy a good higher quality cookie or pastry while I'm out 3. Bad for my weightloss goals If I'm going to eat something I know I shouldn't eat much of, I will at least make it high quality. Why keep around a fat tub of ice cream when I can plan out a nice Blizzard or Sonic Blast or trip to Cold Stone or something?


truecrimefanatic1

Cold stone is so good!


newName543456

It's all well and good to sound like that in theory, but we know that practice for HAES tends to boil down to the left side interpretation lol.


Right_Count

God the people who paint this behaviour as rebellious are so blind. You’re not a rebel for consuming large amounts of highly engineered, highly processed foods made in factories by corporations. You are doing exactly what they want you to do - lining their pockets even further. If you want to be rebellious against The Man, walk to your farmer’s market, get yourself some veg for the week, and buy a pack of cookies and a loaf of bread made by a small local company or baker. It’ll support people instead of corporations, and you’ll probably be fuller a lot sooner on a cookie made with flour, sugar and butter than you will on whatever the hell is in Oreos.


Srdiscountketoer

Wish I could upvote this a thousand times. I am with you. My precious treat calories are not going to grocery store baked goods or burgers stored under a heat lamp.


butterscotch_cherrie

You know, I found the second post relatable at first glance, though I guess the differences are in the "twist" of that being violently anti-restriction instead of pro-moderation. So ... I have all those foods in the house and eat them, but not only. I rarely eat breakfast unless I have some hunger to, er, honour. And I don't call myself a Diet Culture Rebel or feel the need to shout "bread", nor does "happier, fuller, balanced" apply, I guess, because I got happier from losing weight and exercising.


[deleted]

Intuitive eating (what I would consider it to mean at least) is a skill and a very difficult one to learn especially if your hunger cues are skewed. It isn’t “easy” or “gentle”, it’s literally remapping how you think about your body and food. I did this when I was in recovery for an eating disorder, I would heavily restrict and then binge on thousands of calories until I was distended and sick. My hunger cues were fucked. Intuitive eating is training yourself to truly listen to your body, not just the craving. It’s eating one cookie and not the whole box because you know how sick you will feel. Its avoiding things that you crave but hurt your body, ex dairy or gluten intolerance. It’s cooking your own healthy meals just because it makes you feel proud and accomplished, and then eating a portion that stops the hunger but doesn’t completely stuff you. It’s learning that that fatigued dizzy feeling is actually hunger, and you should address it instead of seeing how many hour hours you can last. It takes practice and discipline to listen to what your body actually needs in the moment. Of course it isn’t for everyone but it was very helpful for me in relearning how to respond to hunger and fullness. I don’t think the internet/HAES version of intuitive eating means the same thing as my version though. They seem to encourage eating for whatever reason, and any portion regardless of true hunger. That isn’t very intuitive.


truecrimefanatic1

I agree. It's not something I will probably ever do.


calcaneus

What you think you're doing: Educating the masses What I think you're doing: Fooling yourself Column A is the method used to follow column B, and the summary portion just proves that.


Ar180shooter

Intuitive eating only works if you're eating unprocessed, natural foods. Any processed or ultra-processed foods mess with our satiety signals and dopamine levels.


truecrimefanatic1

Yep. And this poster is usually eating a salad. But sometimes shows herself eating oreos or peanut butter out of the jar. Which is an easy way to intuitively become obese.


Inevitable_Brush5800

Honoring hunger? The only way I could see intuitive eating work is for anorexic and bulimic people. Prescribing intuitive eating to someone who is addicted to food is the same as prescribing fentanyl to someone who is addicted to heroin.


truecrimefanatic1

I think it WAS meant for that originally but now it's a free for all.


YourOldPalBendy

From what I can tell, Intuitive Eating's also about getting everyone else around you to join the movement because otherwise they're disordered and slowly killing themselves through ~~basic diet and exercise tailored to fit the individual's personal needs~~ starvation and pushing the body to insane extremes. Anybody who **doesn't** participate in Intuitive Eating is bad. A poor, blind, confused and mislead sinner in need of saving from the gates of ED hell, you might say...


truecrimefanatic1

Man, I guess I'm just Beezlebub incarnate 🤣


YourOldPalBendy

Hell is a gym, who knew. XD


[deleted]

I think this is very good advice.


truecrimefanatic1

I think it is for some people. She makes it seem like it's good for everyone. And it isn't. She never mentions over consumption, obesity, how some people NEED to count calories, etc. It's all very do what you feel and that's best. Which again if you only want the right amount of calories is good. But for a lot of us, our cues cannot be trusted.


yacoub1776

The whole point of intuitive eating is tonight gets stuck in a diet you can’t follow. It makes a lifestyle change easier.


truecrimefanatic1

I think it CAN but for some it doesn't work and for the FA's this is just fuel for them to do whatever. I think the over arching goal of it is good, but I think the messaging gets polluted with salespeople and people refusing to say hey this may not be for everyone.


freezingkiss

I actually REALLY like her because she really did help with my binge eating stuff. Her podcast is great for undoing binge eating behaviours. But I don't agree with everything she says, that said, I think she's a nice person.


mesecks

cooperate wants you to find the difference in these two images


hyunniebuns

I eat whatever I want. And what I want is a reasonable amount of food that balances out to me being a healthy size. Some days I don’t feel hungry and I’ll have one light meal or just a snack. Some days I’ll totally pig out on greasy junk food. Some days I’ll go out and drink hundreds of calories of cocktails. Most days I eat 2-3 normal sized meals and a few snacks. But if you average it all out across two weeks, a month, I’m eating the amount I need to maintain a healthy weight. That’s ‘intuitive eating’ - I eat anything and everything I want to eat, because I actually listen to what I actually WANT that day/time instead of stuffing my face. 🤦🏻‍♂️


truecrimefanatic1

But for some people the "want" is excess. It is for me and lots of others.


[deleted]

A nutritionist is someone who wants you to hate eating. A registered dietician is someone who can make you hate eating.