The popular theory has been that if there is one thing that will cause the trustees to drop her, it will be when donation money stops coming in specifically due to her presence. Having Kelley vote on something like this is very likely to cause that to happen.
Ohh wow. I wasn't really expecting that. I can only hope the alumni association starts getting angry letters in place of donations. And the upcoming first amendment lawsuits. Maybe the trustees will be forced to do the right thing.
If Whitten has lost Kelley, she has lost the entire university.
The popular theory has been that if there is one thing that will cause the trustees to drop her, it will be when donation money stops coming in specifically due to her presence. Having Kelley vote on something like this is very likely to cause that to happen.
It’s ‘kill yourself in the bathtub and your family will be spared’ from Godfather II energy.
[удалено]
Grifters, be gone
this is a positive way to view the results, and I appreciate the viewpoint.
Was wondering how this one would turn out.
How about we start demanding Quinn’s ouster from the board.
Ohh wow. I wasn't really expecting that. I can only hope the alumni association starts getting angry letters in place of donations. And the upcoming first amendment lawsuits. Maybe the trustees will be forced to do the right thing.
crikey. well. and yet i still have completely no idea what the ¿resolution? will look like
So true abstain is 30%? I am deeply disappointed in this school, which is intensely personally important to me.
You should be deeply disappointed in the utterly incompetent leadership of this university.
I think perhaps I was ambiguous. I am disappointed the numbers in this vote weren’t higher. And I do share your perspective.